![intel s pro medium intel s pro medium](https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/articles/02mVcIbVMaW7Fvp7B3IMG3s-7.fit_lim.size_1050x.jpg)
- #INTEL S PRO MEDIUM UPDATE#
- #INTEL S PRO MEDIUM DRIVER#
- #INTEL S PRO MEDIUM FULL#
- #INTEL S PRO MEDIUM WINDOWS 10#
- #INTEL S PRO MEDIUM PC#
Intel's Alder Lake has completely redefined x86 desktop PC chips with a new hybrid architecture that delivers amazing levels of performance. At their debut, the Ryzen 5000 series were the highest-performing chips on the market and beat Intel in every metric that matters, including gaming, application performance, power consumption, and thermals. For more info, you can head to our expansive in-depth coverage of the Ryzen 5000 series, including pricing, benchmarks, and availability. AMD's newest processors, the Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X, not to mention the Ryzen 5 5600X, upset Intel's entire mainstream desktop lineup, and they certainly remain competitive in a few key areas. You can see how all of these processors stack up in our AMD vs Intel CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy, but the landscape had changed in the wake of AMD's Ryzen 5000 launch.
![intel s pro medium intel s pro medium](https://images.techhive.com/images/article/2014/11/convertiblenotebook_yoga3pro_laptop_o_14_gen_w_h_1405201034gamev1-100529004-orig.jpg)
#INTEL S PRO MEDIUM UPDATE#
We're working to add in a more expansive update to some of the text below, but rest assured that Intel has retaken the lead in several of the categories. We've also thrown in results with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory for good measure.
#INTEL S PRO MEDIUM WINDOWS 10#
You can see the disruptive results in our Intel Core i9-12900K and Core i5-12600K review, and we've also added both our Windows 10 and 11 testing to our CPU benchmark database. Intel's Alder Lake chips take the gaming crown from AMD, and also rival or beat AMD in all meaningful performance metrics, like single- and multi-threaded productivity workloads. If you're looking for the fastest chip on the market, you should look to Intel's potent new Alder Lake series. Overall, there's a clear winner, but which CPU brand you should buy depends mostly on what kind of features, price, and performance are important to you. We'll also discuss the lithographies and architectures that influence the moving goalposts.
#INTEL S PRO MEDIUM DRIVER#
We judge the chips on seven criteria based on what you plan to do with your PC, pricing, performance, driver support, power consumption, and security, giving us a clear view of the state of the competition. This article covers the never-ending argument of AMD vs Intel desktop CPUs (we're not covering laptop or server chips). But in many cases, the answer is actually very clear. In fact, for most users, it's now a blowout win in Intel's favor, as you can see in our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy. That's an amazing reversal of fortunes for the chipmaker after its decade of dominance was completely overturned by AMD's Ryzen 5000 chips. That fact has spawned an almost religious following for both camps, and the resulting AMD vs Intel flamewars, making it tricky to get unbiased advice about the best choice for your next processor. Even the interface for Apple’s latest version of macOS, macOS Big Sur, feels more like the iOS and iPadOS, right down to the icons and new Control Center.If you're looking for the best CPUs for Gaming or the best workstation CPU, there are only two choices to pick from – AMD and Intel. This is the completion of a goal that Apple has been working toward for some time. Naturally, because the M1 chip is using similar architecture to the processors found in Apple’s iPhone and iPad, apps for those devices will now work on the Mac, as well. The fact that this all works without the end user noticing can’t be oversold. And I haven’t noticed any issues with any of them. In fact, nearly every app I’ve been using since I started reviewing the new MacBook Pro 13-inch was built for Intel’s chip architecture including Chrome, Spotify ( SPOT), Slack ( WORK), “Shadow of the Tomb Raider,” and Pixelmator. And since this all happens in the background, you’ll, ideally, never know if an app was built for Intel’s chip or Apple’s. The M1-powered Pro blew the Intel-powered machine away.Īpple does this with a program called Rosetta 2, which translates Intel apps for the M1 chip. I fired up “Shadow of the Tomb Raider” on both the M1-powered Pro with 8GB of RAM and a 2020 13-inch MacBook Pro with an Intel Core i5 processor, Intel Iris Plus Graphics, and 16GB of RAM. The M1-powered MacBook Pro 13-inch features an integrated GPU similar to what you’d find in an Intel-powered Pro.
![intel s pro medium intel s pro medium](https://wcm-cdn.wacom.com/-/media/graveyard/wacomdotcom/images/products/pen-tablets/intuos-pro-small/intuos-pro-sm-multitouch-f.jpg)
And yes, there are expansion dongles to add more ports, but with a $1,299 laptop, you shouldn’t need one. If you’re the type of person who needs as many ports as possible, that’s a big bummer. What’s not so fantastic is that the M1-powered Pro includes just two Thunderbolt/ USB C ports, while the Intel version gets 4. That’s fantastic for professionals on the go.
#INTEL S PRO MEDIUM FULL#
Even after a full day of use, I still had plenty of juice to keep using the Pro well into the night.
![intel s pro medium intel s pro medium](https://www.techbuy.com.au/images/medium/49/P494986.jpg)
And while I can’t say that it specifically manages that, I can tell you that the battery in my review unit seemed like it just wouldn’t quit. As for battery life, Apple promises the Pro will get a whopping 20 hours of power out of a single charge while playing back video, compared to 10 hours for the Intel version of the machine.